|
Fred Newton Scott (1860–1931) was an American writer, educator and rhetorician. In the preface to ''The New Composition Rhetoric'', Newton Scott states “that composition is…a social act, and the student () therefore constantly () led to think of himself as writing or speaking for a specified audience. Thus not mere expression but communication as well is made the business of composition.” Fred Newton Scott saw rhetoric as an intellectually challenging subject. He looked to English departments to balance work in rhetoric and linguistics in addition to literary study. == Questions facing 19th century rhetoricians == Rhetoric in the 1890s was full of vigorous experimentation in rhetorical theory and practice. The Harvard Reports of 1892, 1895, and 1897 generated much public interest and concern about the teaching of writing.〔Murphy, James J. ed. A Short History of Writing Instruction; From Ancient Greece to Modern America. Lawernce Erlbaum Associates; New Jersey, 2001.〕 At this time, composition was shifting away from an emphasis on oratory skills. The 19th-century American University was experiencing a major transformation in its educational purposes. Education was opening up to everyone, including women. Classical rhetoric was being displaced as schools responded to more practical needs, like preparing their students to be excellent employees.〔 Originally, classical rhetoric studies were geared to composition that included emotional and ethical appeals in addition to logical ones. The purpose of oratory skills at this point was persuasion and included a concern of the emotional disposition of the audience. The classical composer shaped the work to be appealing. The composer was to discover the best possible reasons for their argument and persuade the audience to accept their point of view.〔 This belief system began to change. Current-traditionalists were not concerned with probabilities and the subjects were essentially factual or able to be proven. The goal was not to persuade anyone to a particular conclusion. Rather, the focus was just to present the information to the audience and let them do with it what they will. This new method affected the tone and arrangement of the work. Instead of arranging the piece to convince the audience of something, they just arranged it to reflect a rational thought process that the audience could follow. The arrangement became deductive; it was just a way to report facts. Questions for 19th century rhetoricians:〔Gaillet, Lynee Lewis. "Learning from Our Predecessors: The Work of Fred Newton Scott and George Jardine." Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, March 1993.〕 1.How relevant is psychology to composition? 2.How can the change in practical teaching skills caused by a changing social climate best be dealt with? 3.Is teaching grammar really beneficial to the composing process? 4.What is the relationship between rhetoric and literary studies? 5.Should the focus of writing instruction be parts-to-whole or whole-to parts? 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Fred Newton Scott」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|